Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awan
Bio
Journalist Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awan: Social Guardian & Humanitarian. Dedicated to truth and justice, he explores complex social issues and historical narratives to bring clarity. Aiming to bridge the gap between information and empathy.
Stories (17)
Filter by community
US-Iran talks: A percentage assessment of the chances of success, failure and partial success. AI-Generated.
The high-level talks between the United States and Iran, held today in Muscat, the peaceful and beautiful capital of the Sultanate of Oman, are a very sensitive and historic stage in global diplomacy, where the eyes of the whole world are fixed on this table because these talks are not only for the relations between the two countries, but also for the Middle East and the entire international community to guarantee peace, security and economic stability. In the current delicate and complex geopolitical context, the increasing tension between the United States and Iran, economic sanctions, the risks of military conflict, and the balance of power in the region have ensured that a safe, neutral and credible place is needed for the talks, and the Sultanate of Oman, as always, has provided this platform under its historical traditions, high-level and impartial mediation policy, in which the Omani leadership not only highlighted its key role of hospitality but also implemented its consistent policy of finding a peaceful solution in the region. The calm atmosphere of Muscat and Omani mediation are extremely important in balancing the positions of the United States and Iran on Iran's nuclear program and economic sanctions. are playing a role, and analytically, this time, a clear “strategic flexibility” is expected from the US because Washington is preferring a de-escalation arrangement rather than a direct confrontation in the region, under which partial return of Iran’s frozen assets and some humanitarian relief of sanctions can be provided, while Iran is also showing potential flexibility to not exceed the 60% limit in uranium enrichment and limit international monitoring in view of public pressure, demands for economic improvement, and the internal policy of the new administration of President Masoud Pazishkian. As a result, the chances of success of the negotiations are appearing to be 60 to 70% in the current circumstances, because both countries have now run out of room to maintain the status quo, and in case of success, an interim deal is possible that will provide the basis for a permanent solution in the future. However, there are also risks of failure, because the internal political Pressure, regional adversaries, and the political demands of global power can affect it. Oman's foreign policy has always been based on goodwill, neutrality, and the promotion of world peace, which Sultan Qaboos bin Said established and the current Sultan Hisham bin Tariq has taken it to new heights, establishing the Sultanate of Oman as an exemplary diplomatic center on the global stage. Oman also played a key role in the process of the historic nuclear deal in 2013 and the same dedication to world peace remains today. Technical issues such as Iran's nuclear program, enrichment levels, cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and complex issues of monitoring would not have been possible to resolve without Oman's mediation. These negotiations are also the focus of other powerful countries in the region, including Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the United Arab Emirates, where Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates seek stability and see Oman's mediation in the wider interest of the region. While despite Israel's strategic concerns, the attention of the international community is focused on Muscat's peaceful corridors, the global politics of oil and Given the importance of the Strait of Hormuz, the success of these negotiations is essential for the entire world. Muscat's geographical importance and Oman's impartial mediation are like the backbone for the security of this waterway, the restoration of the global energy supply chain, and long-term stability in the region. The details of the delegations involved in the negotiations are also important; The US delegation is led by Brett McGurk, a highly experienced White House official and expert on Middle East affairs, and is accompanied by Acting Special Envoy Abram Paley. The Iranian delegation is led by Abbas Araghchi and Ali Bagheri Kani. All of these experienced diplomats are advancing the negotiations in light of global tensions, economic pressures, and security threats in the region. The impartial facilitation provided by Oman has been appreciated not only by Washington and Tehran, but also by the United Nations and the European Union. Oman has proven that it is not a country but a neutral and effective diplomatic institution for the international community that is capable of protecting human life and global security from threats. The success of the negotiations will provide solid support to Iran's economy and will also be a success in foreign policy for the United States, which will have a positive impact on the global energy market, investment opportunities, regional security, and international relations. There will be, while the failure of the negotiations could lead to military tension in the region, economic uncertainty, and global instability. In short, these negotiations held today in Muscat are not just talks between two countries, but the foundation of a new global diplomatic system, where wisdom, dialogue, and negotiations take precedence over the use of force. Oman's mediation has once again played its historic role in turning the tide of world history towards peace, and it is hoped that this process will provide new horizons of lasting peace, cooperation, and balance for the region and the international community. — Malik Sarfaraz Hussain Awan
By Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awanabout a month ago in Journal
Vasco da Gama: The Founder of Barbarity and Colonial Terrorism in the Garb of Discovery . AI-Generated.
Vasco da Gama is often presented in the pages of history as a great adventurer and conqueror of the seas, but the reality is quite the opposite because his arrival was no less than a human disaster for the Indian subcontinent that changed the destiny of the region. He was actually a fanatical religious plunderer and colonialist whose heart was filled with the ancient hatred of the Crusades for Muslims and immense colonial arrogance for Indians. When he left Lisbon in 1497 on the orders of King Manuel I of Portugal, the red cross symbols on his ships reflected his intentions that this journey was not just for trade but to end the dominance of Christianity and the maritime trade monopoly of Muslims by force. He left traces of his brutality in the coastal cities of Mombasa and Malindi in Africa. After leaving, when he reached Calicut in May 1498, his behavior towards the local ruler, Raja Zamorin, was contrary to any diplomatic etiquette. His most shocking incident occurred during his second voyage in October 1502, when he stopped the ship 'Miri' in the Arabian Sea, which was returning from the Hajj pilgrimage from Mecca, with more than four hundred innocent passengers on board. In addition to respectable merchants, these passengers also included women and innocent children. When the Portuguese ships surrounded them, the captain and passengers of the ship handed over twenty-two thousand gold coins and valuable goods to Gama in exchange for their lives, but this savage man refused to spare their lives even after looting all the property and belongings. British historian R.S. Whiteway writes in his book "The Rise of Portuguese Power in India" that Gama ordered the ship's ammunition depot to be set on fire, during which The scenes were heartbreaking because mothers were holding their little children in their arms and showing them to the Portuguese soldiers that perhaps they would take pity on these innocents and save them. But Gama strictly ordered his gunners to shoot and kill any passenger who jumped into the sea. In this way, the ship continued to burn in the middle of the sea for four days, including the suffering people, until all 400 people were burned alive. Gama's brutality was not limited to Muslims, but he adopted inhumane tactics to intimidate the Hindu Raja of Calicut. When Raja Zamoran sent a respected and elderly Brahmin priest as an ambassador to Gama for negotiations, the brutal Portuguese arrested the old priest and cut off his lips and ears. Then he slaughtered a dog and sewed its ears on the priest's head and returned it with an insulting letter. Sent to the Raja, this incident is mentioned with pride by the Portuguese historian Gaspar Correa himself in his work "Lendas da Índia" which exposes the Portuguese mentality of that time. During the same voyage, Gama captured about eight hundred unarmed fishermen and small local traders on the coast of Calicut and cut off their hands, noses and ears and loaded them into a large boat and put dry leaves on top of it and set it on fire and pushed this burning boat towards the shore so that the people of the city would be terrified to see the severed limbs of their loved ones. He sent a message to the Raja to cook curry for himself from these severed human limbs. These are the gruesome historical facts that the Western narrative has always hidden in the beautiful words of "transition of civilization". Gama introduced a forced permit system called "Cartaz" for the first time in the peaceful trade of the Indian Ocean using cannons and guns, under which every ship was required to be given to the Portuguese. They had to pay extortion, otherwise they would be declared pirates and drowned. In this way, he strangled the independent economy of the subcontinent and laid the foundation for centuries of colonial plunder here. Renowned modern historians like Sanjay Subramaniam make it clear in his book "The Career and Legend of Vasco da Gama" that Gama was not just an adventurer but a violent person to the point of a psychopath who enjoyed playing Holi with the blood of innocents. The stories of his atrocities are also found in the writings of French historian Geneviève Bouchon and Indian researcher K.M. Panicker, which prove that Vasco da Gama's discovery actually brought a message of slavery, religious prejudice and economic destruction to South Asia. Unfortunately, the imprint of the colonial era still remains in our educational curriculum and Pakistan studies books, where Vasco da Gama is taught as a hero and a great man who discovered the way, while a criminal silence is maintained on the massacres committed by him. Due to this curricular gap, our The new generation is unable to recognize its real enemies and friends. It is time to make these historical truths part of the curriculum and force the international community to remove the statues of war criminals like Vasco da Gama from their squares, because these statues are a humiliation to humanity and a source of suffering to the souls of millions of innocent Indians and Muslims whose blood was shed by this brutal man just to obtain gold and spices. The story of Vasco da Gama is the story of a plunderer who stained the seas with blood and history will never forgive him until his true face is fully revealed to the world. And we, as independent journalists, pledge to continue to unmask the distorted faces of history so that future generations can distinguish between truth and falsehood and recognize our true national heroes. Research and writing: Journalist Malik Sarfaraz Hussain Awan
By Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awanabout a month ago in Journal
US, Iran and China: A critical phase in the balance of power in the Middle East. AI-Generated.
The growing tension between the US and Iran in recent months has made the Middle East the center of attention of world powers, where military movements, diplomatic statements, economic relations and behind-the-scenes strategic activities are clearly reflecting a new balance of power. In the current situation, the US has deployed its aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and other naval assets near the region, which is apparently being described as a defensive measure to prepare for possible threats against Iran. However, military experts say that the purpose of this deployment is not only to send a message to Iran but also to assess the changing strategic realities in the region and the new balance of power between world powers, especially at a time when China has established a strong partnership with Iran not only on the economic but also on the diplomatic and technical levels. The 25-year Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement is considered a milestone in global politics, under which energy, infrastructure, trade, technology and possibly defense cooperation are being promoted. In the context of this agreement, the fact that China is buying a large part of Iran's oil despite US sanctions has also become the center of attention of global analysts, which is not only supporting Iran's economy but also meeting China's energy needs. This economic interdependence is a cause of concern for Washington because it appears to be weakening the US policy of pressure. In the same vein, China's key role in restoring diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia three years ago is also a sign that Beijing is now emerging not just as an economic power but as an active diplomatic player, whose effects are being felt on the peace and stability of the Gulf region, international trade and global energy supply. According to defense experts, although the United States is still the largest power in the region in military terms, Iran has unconventional defense capabilities that can be used by any country. In the event of a potential conflict, American interests could be seriously harmed, including advanced drone technology, cruise missiles, coastal defense systems, suicide drones, and regional alliance networks. In addition, an important aspect of modern warfare is the superiority of surveillance and information in space, where Chinese and Russian military satellites are monitoring military activities in the region in real time, making it impossible to completely conceal the movements of American forces. This factor is changing the balance of power and reinforcing the cautious thinking found in Washington. Analysts say that the United States is well aware of the fact that in the event of a direct attack on Iran, the reaction will not be limited to Iran alone, but its effects could spread to the Gulf, the Arabian Sea, global energy markets, international trade, and sensitive waterways for energy transport. In particular, the security of a globally important route like the Strait of Hormuz is of exceptional importance to the global economy. That is why the United States should not close diplomatic channels while maintaining military pressure. While Iran is also trying to give the impression on the diplomatic front that it is not ready for aggression but for the protection of sovereignty, China's role is emerging as a balancing factor in this whole scenario because Beijing is not only strengthening its relations with Iran but is also linking stability in the region, trade, energy supply and global influence with its long-term interests. Overall, the current situation reflects that the world has entered a phase where military power alone is no longer decisive, but economic partnership, technology, diplomacy, information superiority, international cooperation and global strategy have become equally important. These are the factors that have brought the relations between the US, Iran and China to a delicate but decisive crossroads, where the consequences of any miscalculation can have far-reaching effects not only regionally but also globally. Therefore, in the current situation, only reporting on military preparedness and tensions is not enough, but its in-depth analysis, economic impacts, regional stability, It is important to understand the energy supply, defense capabilities, diplomatic relations and strategic strategies of global powers so that the impact of any potential crisis can be accurately assessed and the international community, countries in the region and relevant authorities can take timely measures. This report has been prepared based on this analytical approach and in-depth observations of the current situation. Written and Researched by Malik Sarfaraz Hussain Awan
By Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awan2 months ago in Journal
Questions Over the Priorities of the Bureau of Immigration, Islamabad. AI-Generated.
Pakistan’s Bureau of Immigration and Overseas Employment, Islamabad, has recently been running awareness campaigns and publishing advertisements on social media and other platforms about Omani labour laws; however, serious observers believe that while these activities may be well intentioned, they do not address the real and fundamental issue, because Oman is a fully law-abiding state where laws are strictly enforced and complete legal protection is provided to everyone without discrimination, from workers to traders and from Omani nationals to foreign employees, and the Omani government has established a well-organized, transparent, and effective labour system in which no one’s rights are violated and no one is above the law, yet the continued promotion of Omani labour laws by the Bureau of Immigration Islamabad creates the impression that Pakistanis face legal problems in Oman, whereas ground realities clearly show that this is not the case and that the real issue lies in Pakistan’s internal administrative weaknesses, lack of seriousness in policy making, and absence of effective diplomatic engagement, as experts emphasize that the actual need is for Pakistan to engage in continuous, serious, and dignified negotiations and formal agreements with the Omani authorities to reopen labour visas for the Pakistani workforce, especially when Oman currently has large-scale construction, development, and infrastructure projects requiring skilled, hardworking, and responsible manpower, a standard that Pakistani workers are fully capable of meeting, while the Omani government has consistently prioritized law, discipline, and the protection of foreign workers’ rights, which is why Oman is internationally recognized as a safe, stable, and reliable country, whereas in Pakistan the Bureau of Immigration and related institutions appear focused on internal procedures, paperwork, and promotional activities instead of practical action, the consequences of which are directly borne by Pakistani workers and their families, as the prolonged closure of labour visas for Pakistani workers in a well-regulated and peaceful country like Oman is deeply concerning, leaving thousands of skilled Pakistani workers, already affected by unemployment at home, helpless despite their willingness to work honestly in a nearby and law-abiding country like Oman, while their families in Pakistan continue to suffer from financial pressure, educational difficulties, and social challenges, even though Omani labour laws are clearly worker-friendly and provide a transparent system for grievance redressal, reconciliation, access to courts, exemption from fees, and timely justice, therefore instead of repeatedly promoting Omani labour laws, the Bureau of Immigration’s real responsibility is to draw the attention of the Government of Pakistan toward holding high-level negotiations with Omani authorities, removing existing obstacles, building mutual trust, and adopting a practical strategy to reopen labour visas for Pakistani workers, especially since the reputation of Pakistani workers in Oman has always been positive and the Omani people have consistently treated foreign workers, particularly Pakistanis, with dignity, protection, and opportunity within the framework of the law, while at the same time greater priority must be given to addressing the problems faced by the families of overseas Pakistanis back home, including legal, financial, and social insecurity, issues that can only be reduced when the Government of Pakistan and its institutions move beyond statements and advertisements toward real action, adopt clear policies, and strengthen cooperation with a friendly and law-abiding country like Oman based on mutual respect and trust, because Oman has long set an example in upholding the rule of law, protecting foreign workers, and maintaining transparent systems, and if Pakistan demonstrates seriousness, ongoing projects in Oman can generate dignified employment opportunities for Pakistani workers, reducing unemployment in Pakistan, increasing remittances, and improving the lives of thousands of families, therefore it is essential that the Bureau of Immigration and Overseas Employment Islamabad reassess its priorities, address internal shortcomings, play a constructive role by engaging the Government of Pakistan in effective negotiations with Omani authorities to resolve visa-related concerns, and work toward a practical framework that respects Omani laws, acknowledges the Omani government’s organized system and the positive role of Omani society, and opens employment opportunities for the Pakistani workforce, because promoting Omani labour laws is not the real need for the Bureau of Immigration but rather correcting Pakistan’s lack of serious policy direction and effective diplomacy, and in this regard the Bureau of Immigration and Overseas Employment Islamabad must play a positive role, including contributing to the protection and welfare of the families of migrant workers living in Oman and other countries. Written by Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awan
By Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awan2 months ago in Journal
Challenges Faced by Pakistanis Abroad: Pakistan’s Diplomatic and Economic Failures. AI-Generated.
Start writing... The relationship between Pakistan and the Sultanate of Oman has always been based on brotherhood and mutual respect. Oman has consistently welcomed Pakistani workers and traders. However, the visa obstacles faced by Pakistanis over the past year are not due to the Omani authorities, but are the result of Pakistan’s diplomatic inefficiency. The Government of Pakistan has completely failed to address the concerns of the Omani authorities regarding visas and to reassure them. India, on the other hand, has established mechanisms at the government level for its citizens to work and invest in Oman, ensuring that Omani authorities have no reservations. This comparison clearly shows that when a country’s leadership is serious about protecting its citizens’ interests, it overcomes all obstacles and clears the way. In contrast, our government remains engaged only in political maneuvering. More than a year has passed, yet the Government of Pakistan has still failed to effectively resolve visa-related issues faced by Pakistani citizens in Oman. During this period, numerous Pakistanis have legally registered small and medium-sized companies in Oman to promote trade, completed all required documentation, obtained commercial licenses, and in some cases rented offices, restaurants, and shops on a monthly basis. Yet due to visa delays, they have not been able to start their businesses. These individuals are under severe financial pressure, as they continue to pay rent, government fees, and other expenses without any income. All their hopes are tied to the Government of Pakistan, hoping that a serious diplomatic initiative will resolve their issues, but so far, they have only been met with disappointment. This situation reflects the fact that the Government of Pakistan has failed, on one hand, to provide dignified employment within the country, and on the other hand, those who seek to improve their livelihoods abroad through legal work also face numerous obstacles. Incidents of being offloaded at airports are increasing, which undermines public confidence and damages the country’s reputation. Unemployment, inflation, and economic instability have placed ordinary citizens under immense pressure. When employment opportunities are limited, social deterioration becomes inevitable. In such circumstances, the responsibility of the state to provide its citizens with dignified means of livelihood increases, yet unfortunately, Pakistan’s current policies do not reflect such seriousness. This is precisely where the saying holds true: poverty erases the sense of refinement, and hunger cannot be confined within the molds of etiquette. It is noteworthy that Oman currently has large-scale development and construction projects underway, including new cities, residential communities, modern roads, bridges, ports, industrial zones, and tourist centers, all of which require a significant number of skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled workers. Pakistan has millions of youth skilled in trades such as carpentry, labor work, electrical work, plumbing, welding, driving, and other technical fields, who can play a vital role in these projects. If the Government of Pakistan adopts timely and serious diplomatic strategies, not only can millions of Pakistani families gain employment, but the country can also earn valuable foreign exchange. On the other hand, continuous delays and negligence would waste this golden opportunity. This situation requires serious consideration because, without timely and solid diplomatic action, the economic existence of Pakistani investors and workers abroad could be severely threatened, and Pakistan’s reputation at the international level could also be harmed. The Government of Pakistan must go beyond formal statements and temporary announcements, engage in purposeful and results-oriented discussions with Omani authorities, and secure for its citizens the same practical facilities and protections that other countries successfully obtain for their workforce and investors. It is regrettable that Pakistani ministers and senior officials have visited Oman, yet no comprehensive or clear policy for the issuance of visas for skilled, semi-skilled, and commercial workers has been implemented. These visits have remained largely ceremonial and have not addressed the real issues of the public. Moreover, Pakistan’s senior leadership appears so entangled in internal political differences and power struggles that public issues are sidelined, and parliamentary forums prioritize political conflicts over public welfare, directly harming ordinary citizens. The time has come for the Government of Pakistan to act with seriousness, prioritize the issues of Pakistani investors and workers abroad, and take immediate and practical steps to integrate Pakistan’s workforce into ongoing development projects. Otherwise, this issue could escalate further, with consequences felt not only abroad but also within the country for a prolonged period.By: Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awan
By Malik Sarfraz Hussain Awan2 months ago in Journal
