President Trump suggests Erika Kirk sue comedian Druski over viral ‘Conservative Women in America’ skit

Let’s crash out on Druski. This talented young man has caught the ire of the president of the United States of America. In a sketch online that has garnered close to 130 million views as of this writing, he has focused his comedic eye on conservative women in America without addressing anyone in particular.

He, however, has come under scrutiny for seemingly making fun of Erkia Kirk, widow of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. No names get mentioned in the clip, though. Druski just addresses the energy and quirks of especially white women in the conservative movement.

President Trump suggested that Erika Kirk sue Druski and he mentioned no names either. But how scary is it for the president to say Erika should sue based on a depiction of her. She isn’t slandered or libeled during the sketch. Why would the leader of the semi-free world show total disregard for the First Amendment?

Druski should get more views and more deals like his partnership with T-Mobile. His sense of humor is so spot on and his timing so exact that it would give some the indication that he’s coming after Erika Church without singling anyone out in particular.

His brilliant portrayal of a “good ol’ boy” shows that he has the comedic chops that show his range and abilities.

With his work ethic, he should be in big budget films in the future. His authenticity in creating characters like conservative women has proven to be a windfall for the young comedian.

With his powers of persuasion, the sketch almost appears as a short documentary with comedic flourishes. His mannerisms and control of body movements tell the story about right-wing females of the US.

He might do liberal minded black women in another sketch that he could put a different spin on the situation. Would Trump suggest that a Foundational Black American (FBA) woman sue over a depiction of her from Druski?

What would the lawsuit for Erika Kirk say? That Druski made fun of her and millions of other white conservative women? Such is the ridiculous nature of a ridiculous president.

The truth is that there is no basis for legal proceedings. The courts would toss out the suit like a Frisbee. Druski would be vindicated and not be able to contain his excitement. He would probably reach out to Erika and ask her to be in one of his comedies.

Whatever the case, the question of freedom of speech isn’t a query in this case. Really, there’s no case. It is just the unhinged ramblings from a head of state who has no business being in the White House.

It is up to the citizenry to ridicule anyone and everyone. Punch up or punch down, no punches should be pulled above the waist. That means that content creators should be able to voice their concerns. The power is in the mind of the free person to challenge the status quo.

Druski has a talent for making the everyday extraordinary. That he has a cool demeanor and a great understanding of his audience, lends to his prowess in front of a camera.

With his power using the Internet, he has the possibility to connect to millions of people. Maybe he and Erika could connect and make a sequel to “Conservative Women in America.” That’s a pipe dream but it would be fun to see them both in the sketch poking fun at her base and his most of his base’s opposition.

To push back on the idea that the freedom of speech is dead, Druski stands as a valiant warrior for words.